746551
Last Update Posted: 2015-02-16
Recruiting has ended
Females accepted | 18 Years-45 Years |
80 Estimated Participants | No Expanded Access |
Interventional Study | Accepts healthy volunteers |
Intravenous Versus Oral Iron in Late Pregnancy: Results of Treatment
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of body iron storage replenishment between low dose intravenous iron and oral iron in late pregnancy.
Despite routine antenatal oral iron supplementation, the prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy in developing countries remains high. Apparently, intravenous iron sucrose appears to be safe and efficient in treating within a short period. From literature review, no study of intravenous iron for IDA treatment has been carried out in the third trimester of pregnancy. This research aims to compare the efficacy of body iron storage replenishment at 3 weeks as labor may take place at this point in some women. In this study,500 mg intravenous iron has been given weekly instead of every other day for the sake of patient's convenience in the hope that parenteral iron may become another alternative for treatment of pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia who have difficulties or failures with oral iron.
Eligibility
Relevant conditions:
Anemia
Pregnancy Complications
If you aren't sure if you meet the criteria above speak to your healthcare professional. Criteria may be updated but not reflected here, do not hesitate to contact the study if you think are close to fitting criteria.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
locations
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov