2581475
Last Update Posted: 2016-10-19
Recruiting has ended
All Genders accepted | 18 Years-80 Years |
386 Estimated Participants | No Expanded Access |
Interventional Study | Accepts healthy volunteers |
Efficacy of Segmental Examination Twice of the Proximal Colon on Adenoma Detection
Segmental examination twice of the proximal colon might be helpful to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR).
Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC). Removal of adenomas can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, there is evidence that some patients may develop interval cancers-cancers developed within 3-5 years following colonoscopy and polypectomy. The overall rate of interval cancer was 1.1-2.7 per 1000 person-years. Several studies have suggested that patients who develop interval cancers are more likely to have proximal compared than distal cancers.
One hypothesis is that adenomas may be more likely to be missed in the proximal colon compared with the distal colon. Serrated polyps and some adenomas in the proximal colon may be difficult to detect if they are flat, covered with mucus, or behind folds. A second hypothesis is that neoplastic lesions of the proximal colon may biologically differ from distal lesions and progress to malignancy with a short dwell time.
Several tandem back to back colonoscopy studies have demonstrated that up to 27% adenomas in the proximal colon are missed during routine screening colonoscopy. Hover, examining the colon twice as that in the back to back studies is difficult to be performed in clinical practice. Thus, we developed a novel colonoscopy technique, segmental examination twice of the proximal colon, that is simple and easy to be performed. The current study aims to examine the efficacy of segmental examination twice of the proximal colon on adenoma detection rate (ADR) during routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy.
Eligibility
Relevant conditions:
Colonic Polyps
If you aren't sure if you meet the criteria above speak to your healthcare professional. Criteria may be updated but not reflected here, do not hesitate to contact the trial if you think are close to fitting criteria.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
locations
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov