5024669
Last Update Posted: 2021-08-27
Recruiting has ended
All Genders accepted | 20 Years-40 Years |
80 Estimated Participants | No Expanded Access |
Interventional Study | Accepts healthy volunteers |
Efficacy of Desensitizers in Reducing Post-operative Sensitivity Following Composite Restorations
Composite is one of the common aesthetic restorations used in the dentistry. With the advancements in the biomaterials the application of the composites has broadened. However due to various factors the composites are associated with dental sensitivity. Hence in our study we evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three desensitizing agents in reducing the post-treatment sensitivity for class I composite restoration.
A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in which 80 subjects requiring class I cavity were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 20 patients each: Group C (Control group), Group GL (Gluma group), Group SF (Shield Force Plus group), and Group TC (Telio CS group). The class 1 cavity was prepared and after etching, the desensitizers were applied (except in the control group) and later composite restoration was done. The postoperative pain/sensitivity level was recorded according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on intake of cold drinks; intake of hot drinks; and intake of sugar for different periods of time.
Eligibility
Relevant conditions:
Sensitivity
If you aren't sure if you meet the criteria above speak to your healthcare professional. Criteria may be updated but not reflected here, do not hesitate to contact the study if you think are close to fitting criteria.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
locations
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov